Overview of previous posts here
It's no longer about tobacco alone The list is 45 members long and it shows how the industry recruited their 'contrarians': the industry carefully looked for any person, sane or not, contesting the current status of scientific knowledge.
and one of the more active members in the tobacco economists network with one of his well known unnuanced views:
Dwight Lee Says giving the EPA authority over indoor air "would be like giving a machine gun to a child" is not regarded by the industry as an utterly bonkers viewpoint, but as an actual possibility: the document showed PM was looking for any contrarians and/or extremists who might be useful to implement the tobacco industry's attack on EPA. Sane or not.
(do notice the list also mentions well known early climate pseudoskeptics S. Fred Singer and Patrick Michaels).