tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1847816429050818607.post3200646324989381526..comments2024-02-06T09:51:14.027+01:00Comments on Jules' klimaatblog: Hans Labohm's continuous dishonestyjuleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08149218335071592373noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1847816429050818607.post-15328693064712075532009-01-31T14:17:00.000+01:002009-01-31T14:17:00.000+01:00A very nice example of a moral panic"A moral panic...A very nice example of a <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic" REL="nofollow">moral panic</A><BR/><BR/>"A moral panic can be defined as "the intensity of feeling expressed by a large number of people about a specific group of people who appear to threaten the social order at a given time."Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14265381333005051411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1847816429050818607.post-13256165776802284652009-01-27T00:12:00.000+01:002009-01-27T00:12:00.000+01:00This is the same misleading figure that icecap.us ...This is the same misleading figure that <A HREF="http://moregrumbinescience.blogspot.com/2008/08/unreliability-at-icecapus.html" REL="nofollow">icecap.us</A> was touting last August. Maybe you can find which was the original purveyor of the misleading.Robert Grumbinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10783453972811796911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1847816429050818607.post-38874462156291295302009-01-24T01:01:00.000+01:002009-01-24T01:01:00.000+01:00What Labohm's graph is showing is basically noise,...What Labohm's graph is showing is basically noise, combined with an ENSO effect and solar variance.<BR/><BR/>there's no reason to expect the effect in your last paragraph.juleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08149218335071592373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1847816429050818607.post-15523967969947229402009-01-22T11:02:00.000+01:002009-01-22T11:02:00.000+01:00The longer term graphs show that CO2 lagged temp r...The longer term graphs show that CO2 lagged temp rise.<BR/><BR/>This would mean that at some point temp started to decline while CO2 continued to rise, wouldn't it?<BR/><BR/>Although on a smaller time scale isn't this what is happening with Labohm's graph?<BR/><BR/>If this continued wouldn't temp decline further and at some point CO2 begin to decline, maybe 800yrs or possibly less due to the unprecedented nature of these things?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com